belong to the sector of the industry funds and are usually share funds rarely also to pension funds, which invest nuclear power, chlorine chemistry, violations of human rights, gene/biotechnology, bioassays, Kinderarbeit, hard labour, Pornografie, resources predatory exploitation, armament and discrimination of minorities and women by exclusion criteria as for example only in enterprises, which act and keep house socially, ethicalally and ecologically.

For its capital "only" a good net yield to require, is not enough to many investors any longer. They want to know: What happens with my money, in whom or which it The view is directed strengthened toward financial assets, with which personal net yield connects itself with social use, thus environmental aspects, social and/or ethical interests consideration finds.

There is no contradiction between the economic and ecological requirements the society and the desire of the shareholders for dividends. Ecological funds are suitable for harmonizing personal values with the own financial strategy and offer net yield without regret.

So far the theory. Practice shows that the above mentioned Auschlusskriterien leads to it, to essentially prefer "clean" new technology shares: IT-enterprises did not have Emmisionen and class a working climate. A crash of 50% and more between spring 2000 and 2003 was the result for many funds. Exactly as for all industry funds the dose intends the degree at poisoning of the fund depot also for

funds offer the better (environmental) balance compared with shares by the effects positive thereby for the environment in number and extent. ", the Federal Office for Environment Protection reports.

Articles in category "ofonds"

We found here 1 articles.