By "itself Durchwursteln " or English "Muddling Through "one understands a control conception, which does completely without central and/or centralistic planning, with which the system control as it were than result of a tuning of all participants involved taken place among themselves mutually arises.
The control conception "Muddling Through "was explained the first time 1959 by Charles E. to Lindblom (Biografie of Charles E. Lindblom) in "The Science OF Muddling Through". Further representatives of these opinions were H.E. Wrapp 1967, J. Quinn 1980, K. Ganser, W. Siebel and T. Sieverts.
The theory "of the Muddling Through "originates originally from the range of the society theory and by the organizational theory was only later taken up. Were located in particular questions of the organizational change in the center. "Muddling Through "was developed in more or less direct argument with representatives of flat-determined control concepts. This kind of the control conception ranks among the category of the incrementalistic control (see incrementalism), under what one summarizes beginnings, which reject a comprehensive total planning and instead recommends a control in small, visible and thus easily revisable steps.
The starting point Lindbloms considerations was the limitness of any views of entireness of social systems. Total plans led therefore during direct conversion of necessary way to unexpected and unwanted (secondary) consequences.
The concept from Lindblom was used in different way on economical connections and also as general concept of the enterprise control large approval met with like for example with H.E. Wrapp 1967 or J. Quinn 1980. In word choice and argumentation structure K lean. Ganser, W. Siebel and T. Sieverts likewise against the science of "the Muddling Through " from Charles E. Lindblom (1975, P. 163), which differentiates between "a rational-comprehensive" method and such "of iterative limited comparing" with respect to planning situations. Charles E. Lindblom means however recapitulatory: "So the iterative (itself gradually approximating) method of limited comparisons is indeed also a method or a system; it is not by any means the failure of all methods, for which the administration would have felt guilty. The lack of this method, are numerous nevertheless (...). It has for example no warranty for the fact that all values concerned are considered; so outstanding planning alternatives could remain unconsidered alone, because they did not emerge so far in the interrelation of incremental changes" (ders., 1975, P. 175). A representative for another variant of the incrementalism is Karl Popper with its concept "piecemeal engineering "(piece work social technology), which not completely without planning does, but must her by "the principle of the continuing error correction "be led.
(1) The control concept "Muddling Through "considers not sufficiently the balance of power in the Aushandlungsprozessen.
(2) In addition this kind of the control ends frequently in directionless drift due to the adjustment at the more near in each case future.
(3) Likewise it is frequently necessarily extensive to make decisions not revisable (direction) which itself not when let consequence of incremental steps reach.
(4) The moreover one at the control conception "Muddling Through is criticized "that it supports forces, which want to retain the status quo and prevent innovations.
To the critics of Charles E. Lindblom belong among other things to A. Etzioni 1968 and G. Johnson 1988.
We found here 2 articles.
» Muddling Through
We found here 5 related websites.